– The decision of public water fluoridation, dissected into its most basic components.
– Includes a lesson on the priority of moral considerations.
– Sized for 11″x17″ printing.
– Free to download, print and use as you wish. Please credit source.
When the topic of Water Fluoridation came up in a local Sceptics Society’s Facebook page, I decided to share my experience and conclusions. A week long, 300+ comment, Orwellian nightmare of a debate ensued.
… and the “How to Win the Debate of Public Water Fluoridation” poster was born.
Once broken down into its simplest elements, the madness of water fluoridation becomes so obvious, so ridiculous, that in a strange way… it becomes hilarious! See poster for full details:
First, establish that moral arguments supersede arguments from effect.
Second, show that fluoride (as used in water fluoridation) is a drug.
Follow the inevitable logic: fluoride is being added to the public water… drugs are being added to the public water… people are drinking the public water… people are drinking drugs.
Three issues arise, each of which clinch the case against the morality of water fluoridation:
The three moral problems with public water fluoridation:
—————————1 – medication without informed consent,
—————————2 – medication with uncontrolled dosage, and
—————————3 – mass medication without consideration of individual needs.
The decision to add fluoride to public water is not for dentists to decide. It’s a decision we can all know and understand:
Public Water Fluoridation is immoral and unethical.
It’s safety and effectiveness are irrelevant.
Do not fluoridate public water.
– Educational poster based on Chapter 18 of “Where Did the Towers Go?” by Dr. Judy Wood.
– Statements are empirical and verifiable through links provided below.
– Free to download, print and use as you wish. Please credit sources.
Keeping a hurricane a secret is a sizeable swindle in and of itself, but to be able to keep the public from knowing about a category 3, just miles outside New York City, is nothing less than Orwellian. Even more unthinkable, is the fact that Hurricane Erin’s movements are highly correlated to the single most historic day of our time… 9/11.
(See poster for details)
Is it possible that all of this occurred naturally as a coincidence?
Yes. It’s also possible that our sun will go supernova tomorrow.
Is it reasonably probable?
No. It is so ridiculously unlikely that we can say with all but absolute certainly that Hurricane Erin’s alignment with the World Trade Center destruction was not a natural coincidence.
When taken into a larger perspective, hurricane control becomes a much more plausible and reasonable reality.
It is no conspiracy theory that breakthrough technologies often come out of classified military research. Unfortunately, we must come to grips with the conflicting interests of releasing technology for the good of humanity vs keeping technology a classified in order to maintain military dominance. Hurricane Erin is a critical data point for understanding what classified technology is capable of today. It is safe to assume that since at least 2001, the option to control hurricanes has been available. It is also safe to assume that the same class of technology can control less complex weather systems and events such as flooding and droughts. The implications are dramatic and far reaching.
Hurricane Erin is the most straight-forward, easily verifiable, smoking gun demonstration of advanced weather manipulation technology available. Did you know there was a hurricane on 9/11?
JFK International Airport:
Newark International Airport:
LaGaurdia International Airport:
Compilation of TV weather reports from the morning of 9/11:
NOAA National Hurricane Center – Map of 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season
NOAA National Hurricane Center – 1995 – 2010 Tracking Charts
Article “A Heated 3-D Look Into Erin’s Eye”
Article “Dropping in on a Hurricane”
Wikipedia – Hurricane Erin (2001)
Video – Geraldo Rivera on FOX (skip to 00:50)
Buy on Amazon: